~~ Seems reasonable to me , as Libby is the source ,, so there no "source" for the reporter to protect in this case. A fine line ,as the reporter has rights too.
But in this case I do not see the reporter 's note protected.
Anyone-- even Libby --must be given wide latitude in obtaining
ANY information that could prove they are innocent.~~` TP
===========================
=================
But in this case I do not see the reporter 's note protected.
Anyone-- even Libby --must be given wide latitude in obtaining
ANY information that could prove they are innocent.~~` TP
===========================
=================
Time Ordered to Give Documents to Libby,
Judge Says Time Magazine Reporters Must Turn Over Some
Documents to Former White House Aide - CBS News:
"Judge says Time magazine reporters must turn over some documents to former White House aide"
WASHINGTON, May. 27, 2006
By TONI LOCY Associated Press Writer"
"U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton limited the scope of subpoenas that Libby's lawyers had aimed at Time, NBC News and The New York Times for e-mails, notes, drafts of articles and other information.
But in a 40-page ruling, Walton rejected the news organizations' argument that they have a broad right to refuse to provide such information in criminal cases."
